Back to home
URL: http://www.deloitte-tax-news.de/german-tax-legal-news/participation-in-pure-asset-managing-partnership-harmful-for-trade-tax-privilege.html
22.03.2011
German Tax and Legal News

Participation in pure asset managing partnership harmful for trade tax privilege

Real estate companies with a German permanent establishment (e.g. management based in Germany) may qualify for an extended trade tax deduction, thus effectively paying no trade tax on rental income. Under the extended trade tax deduction, lease income derived by entities whose activities are limited to the administration of their own property is exempt from trade tax. Although certain other activities may be carried out (such as the administration of the entity’s own capital), income derived from such activities do not qualify for the benefit. Activities that can jeopardize the availability of the extended trade tax deduction include the renting out of business fixtures (e.g. a loading ramp) and property trading activities. In addition, German courts have regarded the participation in a trading or deemed trading partnership as harmful for the trade tax privilege, on the grounds that the partner is tainted by the trading nature of the partnership.

The German Federal Tax Court (BFH) recently ruled that the extended trade tax deduction will not be available to a non-managing general partner in a limited partnership (KG) that is not deemed to be trading (case reference: I R 67/09). In the case, the taxpayer (a GmbH) only engaged in the administration of its own property. The sole activity of the KG was the renting out of an office building. The KG in which the GmbH was a general partner was established as a pure asset managing partnership, i.e. it was totally transparent for tax purposes and not subject to trade tax. The BFH concluded that the participation in a KG is not an activity allowed by the literal wording of the law, and it rejected any different approach based on the transparency of the KG for tax purposes. The KG’s property should not be regarded as the property of the partners. The BFH’s ruling seems to be based more on civil law than tax law, so the decision also should apply to a participation in a KG as a limited partner, as well as a participation in a GbR (unincorporated civil law association).

Ansprechpartner

Dr. Bettina Lieber | Düsseldorf
Maryna Shekhovtsova | Düsseldorf

www.deloitte-tax-news.de Diese Mandanteninformation enthält ausschließlich allgemeine Informationen, die nicht geeignet sind, den besonderen Umständen eines Einzelfalles gerecht zu werden. Sie hat nicht den Sinn, Grundlage für wirtschaftliche oder sonstige Entscheidungen jedweder Art zu sein. Sie stellt keine Beratung, Auskunft oder ein rechtsverbindliches Angebot dar und ist auch nicht geeignet, eine persönliche Beratung zu ersetzen. Sollte jemand Entscheidungen jedweder Art auf Inhalte dieser Mandanteninformation oder Teile davon stützen, handelt dieser ausschließlich auf eigenes Risiko. Deloitte GmbH übernimmt keinerlei Garantie oder Gewährleistung noch haftet sie in irgendeiner anderen Weise für den Inhalt dieser Mandanteninformation. Aus diesem Grunde empfehlen wir stets, eine persönliche Beratung einzuholen.

This client information exclusively contains general information not suitable for addressing the particular circumstances of any individual case. Its purpose is not to be used as a basis for commercial decisions or decisions of any other kind. This client information does neither constitute any advice nor any legally binding information or offer and shall not be deemed suitable for substituting personal advice under any circumstances. Should you base decisions of any kind on the contents of this client information or extracts therefrom, you act solely at your own risk. Deloitte GmbH will not assume any guarantee nor warranty and will not be liable in any other form for the content of this client information. Therefore, we always recommend to obtain personal advice.