Back to home
URL: http://www.deloitte-tax-news.de/german-tax-legal-news/bfh-rules-on-organizational-integration-requirement-and-the-need-for-a-controlling-company-to-be-regarded-as-a-taxable-person-for-vat-grouping-purposes.html
21.02.2017
German Tax and Legal News

BFH rules on organizational integration requirement and the need for a controlling company to be regarded as a taxable person for VAT grouping purposes

VAT Group – organizational integration can exist even if the management boards of the controlling and the affiliated companies are not identical

Germany’s Federal Tax Court (BFH) issued a decision on January 25, 2017, in a case involving the establishment of a VAT group. The BFH held that for a VAT group to be recognized, the parent company must have control over the management of the affiliated company and the parent must be taxable person in its own right.

Background

Ten percent of the plaintiff, a German limited liability company (GmbH), was held by M and 90% of the company was held by her son S. By virtue of a contract, which was designated a "contract of employment for managing directors", S was appointed as the managing director of the GmbH with the sole right to represent the company. S did not receive a fixed monthly salary for these services and he had to comply with the instructions of the shareholders' meeting and V, the managing director of another GmbH, A-GmbH. The shares of A-GmbH and those of the plaintiff were contributed into a newly established GmbH, F-GmbH, whose purpose was to hold and manage the family participations. V, acting as the managing director of F-GmbH and having the sole right to represent the company, held 90% of the shares of F-GmbH and M held 10% of the share capital. Based on the findings in a tax audit, F-GmbH provided consultancy services to the plaintiff and to A-GmbH during the year at issue.

According to the findings of the Local Finance Court (FG), V had control over the company and S did not take care of the business, but left it "completely and without restriction" to V, who received a salary from the GmbH as an employee of the plaintiff.

The plaintiff considered that it was integrated into the VAT group of the controlling company, F-GmbH, and so it did not file a VAT return. After conducting a tax audit, the German tax authorities took the position that the plaintiff was not financially and organizationally integrated into F-GmbH and, therefore, it had to be treated as an independent taxpayer for VAT purposes.

Decision of the BFH

The BFH concluded that the parties met the requirements to constitute a VAT group under German VAT law. To constitute a VAT group in Germany, the companies must be organizationally, financially and economically integrated.

Financial and economic integration

Being financially and economically integrated means to hold a majority participation in the affiliated company and to cooperate with each other economically, resulting in a situation where the parent company has control over the subsidiary during the course of the current business. The BFH noted that F-GmbH held the majority of the voting rights in the plaintiff and so was able to influence the decision-making process. The plaintiff was thus financially integrated into F-GmbH. With regard to the economic integration of the plaintiff, the BFH pointed out that the situation as a whole is decisive and that the adoption of an organizational structure does not require that all three integrating factors be equally identifiable.

Organizational integration generally is achieved where personnel interdependence exists in the management board of the holding and the controlled entity; in particular, where the managing director of the holding company also is the managing director of the controlled entity. However, the BFH emphasized that – in exceptional cases – organizational integration can be achieved where the facts are such that the controlling company can intervene in the core area of the company's ongoing management. In this case, V acting as the managing director of F-GmbH, was in a position to exercise control over the plaintiff.

Although S was appointed managing director of the plaintiff, the terms of the employment contract required that he follows the instructions given by the shareholders' meeting and the managing director of A-GmbH (i.e. V).

According to the findings of FG, it was V who actually managed the business of the plaintiff rather than the appointed managing director, S. Moreover, S generally agreed to the transactions undertaken by V to the extent such decisions concerned him. This was exactly the role S should play in the management of the plaintiff according to the contract of employment. Therefore, with regard to the VAT grouping requirements, there is sufficient substance of organizational integration.

Independent commercial activity of controlling company

The BFH referred to its previous decisions in cases with similar issues (decisions dated October 9, 2002 V R 64/99 and December 2, 2015 V R 67/14), which provided that the controlling company of a VAT group must qualify as a taxpayer on a stand-alone basis. The Senate states as far as EU law (see ECJ judgement as of April 9, 2013 C-85/11) would come to a different result, Article 4 (4) (2) of Directive 77/388 / EEC does not have direct effect and is not applicable.

Comment

In its decision, the BFH emphasized that organizational integration can exist even if the management boards of the companies are not identical, provided the control by the parent company is safeguarded by other effective organizational means. With respect to the requirement that the controlling company engage in its own business activities, the BFH has not changed its position even in view of the decision of the CJEU in Commission v. Ireland (C-85/11). As a result, it is expected that the requirement to be a taxable person on a stand-alone basis will give rise to more litigation.

www.deloitte-tax-news.de Diese Mandanteninformation enthält ausschließlich allgemeine Informationen, die nicht geeignet sind, den besonderen Umständen eines Einzelfalles gerecht zu werden. Sie hat nicht den Sinn, Grundlage für wirtschaftliche oder sonstige Entscheidungen jedweder Art zu sein. Sie stellt keine Beratung, Auskunft oder ein rechtsverbindliches Angebot dar und ist auch nicht geeignet, eine persönliche Beratung zu ersetzen. Sollte jemand Entscheidungen jedweder Art auf Inhalte dieser Mandanteninformation oder Teile davon stützen, handelt dieser ausschließlich auf eigenes Risiko. Deloitte GmbH übernimmt keinerlei Garantie oder Gewährleistung noch haftet sie in irgendeiner anderen Weise für den Inhalt dieser Mandanteninformation. Aus diesem Grunde empfehlen wir stets, eine persönliche Beratung einzuholen.

This client information exclusively contains general information not suitable for addressing the particular circumstances of any individual case. Its purpose is not to be used as a basis for commercial decisions or decisions of any other kind. This client information does neither constitute any advice nor any legally binding information or offer and shall not be deemed suitable for substituting personal advice under any circumstances. Should you base decisions of any kind on the contents of this client information or extracts therefrom, you act solely at your own risk. Deloitte GmbH will not assume any guarantee nor warranty and will not be liable in any other form for the content of this client information. Therefore, we always recommend to obtain personal advice.